Facebook SF Lawyers Twitter SF Lawyers Google + SF Lawyers Linkedin SF Lawyers


ES | CA | EN | RUS |  中文
Facebook SF Lawyers Twitter SF Lawyers Google + SF Lawyers Linkedin SF Lawyers




Thursday, 23 November 2017 16:37

The subsidiary civil responsibility of the company in the crimes of its workers

When a crime is committed, in addition to the criminal sanction that the court determines, the person or entity that is considered guilty must assume the civil responsibility that obliges it to repair the damages that it has caused.

In the case of individuals or individuals convicted of a crime, everything is very clear. But this is not the case when considering legal persons, corporations, associations or foundations. The fact of legally recognizing that legal persons can commit criminal offenses, puts on the table of the discussion of the jurists the subject of the civil liability subsidiary of a company in the crimes of its workers.

Does a company or an organization have to assume subsidiarily the civil responsibility of an offense committed by an employee?

A very recent case is the ruling of the Supreme Court, on April 6 of this year. It condemns a company to compensate subsidiarily for damages to the victims of crimes of misappropriation, committed by some of its managers.

What does subsidiarity imply? In the aforementioned case, the people who actually committed the crime, the responsible managers, received their criminal and civil sentences. The amount they had to reimburse for the crime committed was established.

It also sentenced the company in which these employees worked, to assume that debt in the case in which they did not face their civil liability derived from the crime. Here lies the subsidiarity.


The company in question appealed to the Supreme Court, but the Supreme Court upheld the ruling based on Article 120.4 of the Criminal Code, which establishes that civilians will be responsible "... natural or legal persons dedicated to any kind of industry or commerce, for crimes that have committed their employees or dependents, representatives or managers in the performance of their obligations or services.

A company is, therefore, responsible for the crimes committed by its employees, and has the obligation to assume responsibility and reparations for the damages caused by them.

This subsidiary civil liability has its explanation in that the law understands that an employer can reduce the risk of harm created by employees.


Hence, the most appropriate means to avoid these responsibilities is to prevent crimes within the company. Putting in place internal measures to reduce the risk of crimes, and therefore of damage, is a necessity for corporations and organizations, whatever their type. This prevention requires a system of rules and internal functioning that minimizes the risk of crimes and maximizes the possibility of early detection of criminal activities.

In general, situations in which one or more employees commit crimes in a company occur in contexts characterized by:

  • Lack of adequate internal controls.
  • Lack of staff training.
  • Permanent rotation of positions.
  • Messy and confusing documentation.
  • Discontent, unmotivated staff.
  • Low wages.

It is important that every organization self-evaluates in relation to exposure to their employees committing crimes. And also, to proceed with the restructuring to improve this aspect.

At present, the legal teams of the organizations elaborate plans of prevention of criminal risks. There are tools on the market that allow you to easily identify the risks associated with situations that may lead to crimes.

The organization and commitment of employees with the company is a fundamental part of prevention.

Writings SF Lawyers